Nicholas Carr, Don Tapscott face off on whether IT really does matter in an InfoWorld article. A topic I've been chiming in on for a long time. Carr keeps beating his dead but differentiated horse:
"Distinctive systems once provided competitive barriers," Carr said..."But barriers have eroded as accessibility, affordability and standardization have increased," Carr said. The economies of scale that standardized open systems provide has outweighed the costs of the temporary advantages that proprietary systems offer, Carr argued.
And Tapscott takes him to task:
"Companies can use IT to transform business processes that are not easy to replicate," Tapscott told the IDG News Service after his address. "New business processes can help drive new business models that are even harder to replicate, and can transform the whole culture of a company, which is even more difficult, and may be even impossible, to replicate."
The other part of this debate is John Seely Brown's view of Social Software, to let workers: “collectively improvise and innovate.”
At the core, this means the ease of group forming with simple tools to solve problems and adapt processes. As evidence, almost every single use case for Socialtext has been invented by our customers over the last couple of years. Why? Because users themselves, not designers, experts or managers, can create information architecture and simple applications.
Distinctiveness comes not just from systems, but in most cases, how users use them. Cases in point include user created customer care, day-to-day coordination and more. Productivity is always a people problem, and people are the best at solving them, its their own pain.
Recent Comments