« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 2008

February 28, 2008

Nofollow Default on Google Sites

As I've blogged about for some time now, nofollow tags are not a fit for wikisKevin Burton notes it is the default for all links in Google Sites:

The rel=nofollow attribute is a cancer that’s destroying the link graph.

Every URL I create is going to be blocked from link based trust metrics like PageRank? That’s just dumb. I’d rather use another wiki system that doesn’t penalize my linking behavior.

I realize that your intention is to fight spam but you should pursue and algorithmic approach. Blacklisting the entire Internet is NOT the solution.

It’s clear by now that Google uses other metrics for page ranking (almost certainly including HTTP traffic monitoring by now) so this isn’t the end of the world.

Linking is the whole point of the Internet! Creating road blocks for EVERY LINK in the system is the antithesis of a free an open web!

I'm glad Kevin is saying nofollow is not the web (outside of the blogs and comments it was designed for) and in this world view you can only give Google Juice and it doesn't give back.  Such a view and action only favors those in a dominant network position.

February 27, 2008

Jotspot Finally Revived as Google Sites

When Jotspot was acquired by Google, I was obviously waiting and watching for them to make something out of it.  Rob Hof reports that it is launching tonight as Google Sites.

Ever since Google bought the wiki-based online application startup Jotspot in late 2006, people have been wondering if it had disappeared forever inside the bowels of the search giant. Tonight, Google’s launching Google Sites, using Jotspot’s technology to create a free group collaboration service that will be part of its online software suite Google Apps.

He goes on to compare it with Sharepoint and Lotus Notes, which is a stretch of the imagination.  I have no doubt that Google Apps is a great long term bet, and Sites will raise individual awareness of a simpler way to work together. 

And with a lot of retrospection I have tremendous respect for Joe and Co.

All I can really say for now is welcome back to our party.

You Judge Wikileaks

Wikileaks, a site for whistleblowing otherwise confidential documents, had its domain name desisted by a federal judge in California and now has free speech legal support.

...One reason why U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White ordered the domain name offline was that Wikileaks had not sent a lawyer to a hearing or responded in any form. After that, a judgment for the plaintffs wasn't exactly a surprise.

Wikileaks, by the way, was sued by a group of Swiss bankers--Bank Julius Baer--who claim in the lawsuit that confidential information is on the site. Wikileaks is still online at the Internet address http://88.80.13.160/wiki/Wikileaks and a host of mirrors including wikileaks.cx.

A strength and a weakness is that a wiki is a central resource with decentralized control.  That openness and the open access to provision a wiki, makes models like Wikileaks possible, if not inevitable and ubiquitous.  Plus volunteered mirroring when a community starts to carry value that people don't want to shut down.

Regardless of if you think Wikileaks is a good thing for our society and the rule of law, if how information wants to be free trumps the Freedom of Information Act, its more than inevitable forces at play.  Wikileaks grew to the point where its community developed norms and standards, if not a good bullshit detector, which is encouraging for its half-life.  And perhaps inevitable if it is to be credible, by a different judge.

I have to draw the distiction between these wiki moments in nascent communities on the public net and what happens behind the firewall.  Such re-education from successes like Wikipedia or failures like Wikitorials are a big part of what we do.  In an enterprise you have both transparency and accountability.  If someone break the rules you know, and you can, um, fire them.  I haven't seen that happen, and perhaps there is a different kind of self-regulation.

Scaling Customer Service Video

Below is a video of a panel I was on with Heather Champ from Flickr, Frederick Mendler from Rackspace, Pratap Penumalli from Google, and moderated by Marc Hedlund of Wesabe at Customer Service is the New Marketing.

After the event, Socialtext signed on to the Company Customer Pact.

Crowdsourcing some good

Rob Wright at Socialtext asked me yesterday how he could set up a non-profit organization to make donations tax deductible for the $20k he and others are raising for a friend's liver transplant.  I found my answer lacking, so:

Crowdsourcing some good

I got some good responses worth collecting in one place.

 

         
  Bryn H bhell13   @Ross - Not sure it's tax deductible but I know people who have used dropcash.com           
  Pierre Omidyar pierre   @Ross check with local community foundation. They should know how to help, or someone who can, receive medical donations.           
  driehle driehle   @Ross: Rather than starting a non-profit, I'd seek fiscal sponsorship from an existing non-profit.           
  alexschmidt alexschmidt   @Ross try contacting chaya!: permalink           
  Darius C. Dunlap chrisdunlap   @Ross - try Penninsula Community Foundation or San Francisco Foundation... expertise as "Fiscal Sponsors" for projects & New non-profits       
 

I'll update this post later with what Rob finds out from this great advice.

UPDATE from Rob:

Background: friend is in need of new kidney and approximately 40 individuals want to help financially. 
  • Setting up a non-profit org takes about 3 months and $3.000 to $10,000 to set up.  Additionally, the money raised can not go to just 1 individual.  So that option is out.
  • I have found two non-profits, http://www.transplants.org/ and http://www.transplantfund.org/ that for a fee of either 4% or 5% will accept donations on behalf of someone and pay any and all related bills and those donations are tax deductible.    They actually cover a wide range of needs and claim to help in the organization of events like a golf fundraiser. 
  • Our last option is to simply deposit funds into a bank account and track and disperse funds by hand.

February 22, 2008

Enterprise 2.0 Wiki Essentials Kit, Volume II

Socialtext released its second version of its Enterprise 2.0 Wiki Essentials Kit:

  • Gartner Magic Quadrant Report
  • Macehiter Ward-Dutton Analyst Paper
  • Radicati Group Messaging Technology Report
  • IDC Whitepaper
  • Wikinomics Chapter 9
  • Socialtext Top Ten List
  • Socialtext Technical Whitepaper
  • Link to four Archived Webinars
  • Customer Case Study Briefs

Go get it.

February 21, 2008

TransitCamp

TransitCamp is this weekend at Socialtext in Palo Alto:

TransitCamp is inspired by BarCamp. Bar Camp events are powered by participation and collaboration. TransitCampBayArea will highlight the public transit system in the Bay Area Region and will bring together transit officials and citizens to discuss stuff like: getting schedules on the go, the future of the Bay Area transit system, experiences and observations (not complaints, though), the websites, cool ideas for attracting more riders, etc.

Our focus is on encouraging more people to use public transit. Certainly that doesn't exclude infrastructure, but I don't think a bunch of web geeks should be focusing on that. We discussed the following three areas in which the '2.0' crowd can contribute to the conversation:

 

  • technology
  • culture
  • education

Consider participating.  Its encouraging that local transit officials are.

Mike Gotta's Wiki Moment

Mike Gotta:

Great example of a "wiki moment". You come across a topic or issue that is confusing. Information sources, including subject matter experts, do not provide enough insight. The topic though has enormous implications. So you collect information for personal clarification (in this case, using a wiki). The body of information grows as you pull content together. It evolves into a participatory environment - beginning with your own social network of friends that contribute their perspectives. But the wiki has the potential for network effects to kick in as friends invite friends and so on to the point where perhaps the wiki will "'go viral". At some point - the community gets noticed more broadly and mainstream conversations are altered as a result.

I'm pretty sure this scenario could be duplicated within your own enterprise.

What's he talking about?  Superdelegates.org in this case.  Wiki moments are beautiful things, when it all clicks.

February 20, 2008

The New Definition of Fun

I'm at Kellogg Technology Conference today, listening to Jeff Bell, Corporate Vice President of Global Marketing at Microsoft, talk about interactive entertainment.  What I found interesting is the business model considerations and big launch marketing insights.  Here's an impressionary transcript.

Specifically with Xbox. 41.1% of households own at least one gaming console, with an 18.5% increase in the last two years.  Largest genre Action and Adventure, was surpassed this year by family and social games.  The primary demographic driver is no longer young white males, the average age is moving into the mid thirties and a balancing of genders (now 60/40, and in teens its 50/50).  As the hardware evolves, so does the software and usage.

$18 billion industry in 2007.  Looking to not just be a market share leader, but a wallet share leader.  Like Windows, Xbox 360 looks to be an ecosystem leader, with the most partners of this generation.  By the end of this year we will have 300 games for $3-5 that you can download and play from the Arcade.  We don't have as many first party or exclusive titles as our competitors, so when we win everyone wins.

The average Xbox household has 7 games attached to it, with 4 accessories (controllers, etc.).  Rock Band and Guitar Hero are exciting because they are evergreen franchises, because you can download additional content over time.  3 million songs downloaded for Guitar Hero 3.  Packs like the Brady Bunch.  In the future you bring any content, including what you generate, onto the Xbox and it suddenly becomes more fun. 

What if you were the person to generate dance steps or riffs and upload them into the community and gain monetization?  Games for Change says gaming is where film was in the 1920s and 30s, it is just coming into its own for a diversity of content  Games for Change has 5k teams trying to develop the best game about global warming.

I came to Microsoft to develop some consumer marketing muscle.  Xbox Live has 10 million members globally.  We get community. 60-70% of users connect to it.  Just launched movie downloads in Canada and Europe.  Fundamentally a great brand has to be an external and outrageous promise.  The New Definition of Fun is a committment to continual newness. Promises let us segment our customer targets, which have regional differences and lets us go after them with different messages:

  • Xbox 360 has more fun for your friends and family.  Parental controls with all rating systems as a proof point, and then going after games that matter.
  • Xbox 360 has the biggest blockbusters. Taking control of the Grand Theft Auto IV launch to also help explain the value of our platform. 
  • Xbox 360 has the most Choice and Value.  We didn't put BlueRay or HD DVD in, but instead DVD because it is a global standard.  I thank the Wii for broadening people's minds.  Rock Band is the new Twister, we need to bring this kind of family entertainment back.
  • Xbox 360 owns Sports.  Fell over the last year from 25% to 20% of the market, and needs new innovation.

Three years ago these four statements had not been realized.  Applying good business and marketing principles, partnered and focused, and seizing pricing and customer segmentation opportunities has realized two quarters of profit for what had been previously unprofitable. 

We are the largest distributor of downloadable HD content.  The only online distributor of Movies and TV in High Def (huh? Apple?), with 3k hours of movie and television content.  Twice the hours of the leading cable provider.

On the launch of Halo 3, the largest consumer entertainment launch in history.  They asked Peter Jackson about LotR 3 and he said, "You don't have to see the first two movies to enjoy the third, and the third time is a charm."  Primary target was halo purchases, focus on the engaged.  Secondary target was Next Gen Inenders, focus on PS swings and fence sitters, migrate Xbox v.1 owners.  Broad target: Entertainment Enthusiasts, male gamers age 17-35, tuned in to entertainment hits.  Grew the core with real world puzzles that were hacked in less than four hours.  Shows a commercial, "Believe," for the masses that is about a hero, with the classic struggles -- man vs. man, man vs. self and man vs. environment.  Reused the diorama in the commercial in different creative, one version viewed over 27 million times on YouTube.  Launched the game without showing it.    New definition of reach and frequency is showing a commercial once on tv and gaining 40 million online views.  Biggest opening day in entertainment history with $170 million in day one sales, and over 10k retailers worldwide hosing midnight madness events. 

In a closing recruiting pitch he talks about how Microsoft has changed, and how if you see them in the Silicon Valley they are open and constructive partners, not "we're going to beat you or buy you" -- and jokes, "except if you are Yahoo."

February 12, 2008

"Wiki Moment"

I have a lot to blog about when it comes to my trip to Italy.  But I have to share the phenomenon of the "wiki moment" that emerged out of the State of the Net conference. Here's actress and blogger Marina Remi's moment of improvisation in the joy of sharing:

Such moments are exploding out of nowhere across the net.  While a "wiki moment" lacks definition until you contribute to it Gigi helps add some context.

What's your "wiki moment?"

February 06, 2008

Italy Bound

I'm flying tonight to Italy to contribute to Paolo Valdemarin's State of the Net conference in Udine.  There's a wiki, just in case.  Euan Semple, Dave Sifry, Dave Winer and Anthony Mayfield and other usual suspects will be taken out of their element as well.

I'll also be in Milan and may get to see AC Milan play Siena on Sunday :-)

Oh, and a reminder for the locals to join me for lunch today.

February 04, 2008

Death by Mainstreaming

When you visited Yahoo!, perhaps on a blogger pass, often you would find a product manager or executive extolling their mainstream virtues.  Every time I'd visit I'd hear that word, mainstream, and wondered if it was some derivative of their mission or boasting of begotten power. 

Yahoo! arguably was the first company to mainsteam open internet services.  A great accomplishment that began with linking elsewhere with something that made the net more usable.  Big laurels.

But the context in which I kept hearing that word was relative to Web 2.0 innovation.  An innovative prototype that had yet to be mainsteamed.  Or worse, describing the factions in the company.  Old services that were mainsteamed vs. newly acquired darlings that had yet to go through the process of assimilation.

Yahoo! to their credit not only acquired some of the best Web 2.0 companies during a certain time period, like Flickr, del.icio.us and Upcoming.  They left them largely alone.  But the competing legacy services were too.  The graph to the right isn't just the hockey stick everyone wants to skate too, its the before and after for Flickr for when they shut Yahoo Photos down.  It would have been a greater and more timely hockey stick if they did it two years earlier.  And with the multitude of other competing properties.

As a media company, perhaps this could be viewed as offering more channels.  But mainstreaming was a barrier to leveraging latent network effects as a business and a barrier to innovation in the culture.  It isn't just acquisition integration, and some acquisitions should be left to a minor role, but the in-house projects and people trying to advance the organization as what is mainstream changes and can be changed. 

Maybe Google will suffer the same as they get older and its a plight of any successful company in a dynamic market.  They are still young enough to let YouTube eclipse Google Video.  The Innovator's Dilemma doesn't explain it enough when a good part of the organization was doing more than playing lip-service to the change.  There was a tremendous opportunity with the right talent and assets to present a new product strategy that either revive or destroyed old assets with a social overlay.  But perhaps with the founding management they couldn't get past mainstreaming products, relatively depreciating assets, misdirected attention and playing with monetization embedded in the social fabric.  They could have defined their own game.

Enough writing in the present tense.  The point of this post isn't lost opportunities at Yahoo! (although I am asking the question why). Its the sad fact that when the Microsoft merger goes through, it will destroy the best parts of value and culture.  When Microsoft owns Yahoo!, do you think it will side in favor of mainstreaming, or the next revision?  My guess us uncreative destruction.

Geek Squad on Marketing is a Tax You Pay for Being Unremarkable

I'm sitting in Customer Service is the New Marketing, an event hosted by Getsatisfaction.  Robert Stephens, Founder and Chief Inspector of The Geek Squad is giving a talk on "Marketing is a Tax You Pay for Being Unremarkable."  This is a rough impressionic transcript.

Robert speaks of the origins of Geek Squad, the purposeful choice of a non-technical brand for a technology company.  Companies want to spoon-feed the plot of the movie, and are afraid that you will think of them in ways that are off the plot.  You have to dare your company to be authentic enough so you won't have to waste money on Superbowl ads.  Its interesting how Robert made conscious detailed decisions such as what car to have for the business.  The French believe that when all currencies and trademark laws in the EU, you loose differences, so they have a Ministry of Culture and perhaps wine and cheese are more important than competing in the auto market.  It became a game, one guy with a car and a service showing up at places rich people hang out like the opera.  Those rich people may not have a computer problem at the moment, but its a kind of time-released marketing.  The faith you have in your brand and message to employees, that its okay to do the right thing, is extremely powerful. 

Do a little weirdness.  In business you have what you do and how you do it.  And you have to continually do things that don't make sense so you can continually do new things and make it fun.

Picasso said great artists steal.  But don't look in your industry.  If you steal an idea from a different industry, the people in it will tell you at great length how they do it, because they aren't competitors.  From watching Nick at Nite he got the idea to get his fashion sense from the government, a consistent branding to apply on all kinds of cars.  Companies know what they want to do, but they reach for a cliche.  Get the foundational stuff right.  Instead of t-shirts and jeans, or a damn polo shirt, I saw Apollo 13 and found NASA images that were public domain -- the engineers didn't realize they were wearing a uniform, they were just geeks.  NASA was an ultimate model to co-opt, but even more, beyond doing something weird, it was something no competitor would do.  Yes I give them die-cast badges, but we show up in people's home and need to present identification.  I want to get attention and stand out and not have to pay for advertising, but need other people to convey it -- the founder's dilemma.

Saddam Hussein was quite creative if you think about it.  Had people dress like him with the same mustaches, so you couldn't tell if he was dead.  Is the quiet leader that enables people to innovate and a company that could survive without him is perhaps better?  You can control the employee experience, with the skills they bring to the company and the skills you add to them.  Marc Andreessen says to hire curiosity, drive and ethics.  Curiosity is that enthusiasm that gets people to solve problem, drive gets the company going and ethics are critical with all the transparency we have today.

So how do you keep the culture going?  Your companies are closed social networks, not open to everybody.  You don't friend everyone on Facebook.  Part of it is who you allow in and who you don't.  There should be a 2 year waiting list to get into your company.  Like social networks, the more people that join, its possible to get stronger.  Everyone has something to contribute to the culture, you have to set up rituals to get people talking to each other so in the future they will reach out to each other.  In between LAN gaming, they are talking about the budget.  Every intranet should be a damn wiki.

All small companies want to be large, and large ones want to be nimble.  Large companies are here to learn from the small ones.  With Best Buy we can help people that can't access the internet in a different way than telling them to go to our website.  You can grow a company by raising money, but they will want to sell it.  But when you are talking about the intangibles that matter, that takes real bravado and you have to be careful about ownership.  You can't franchise great customer service.  There was a fourth way, with Best Buy we let them be differentiated. There is no accident that Dell is in Best Buy.  Flat screen TVs you have to see to buy.

I started researching what happens to founders in acquisitions, they usually get kicked out or leave after 12 months.  Are all corporations evil?  It seems to be too obvious to be true.  There is a lot to contribute if you are creative, especially in tech support.  Nothing about this is being perfect, it is about letting your customers know you are human and trying.  Try to train agents to never say I don't know, and to say, I'll find out.  We aren't the same as we used to be, but it is getting better with Best Buy and I stay up later than my competition.

What has happened to our jocks in society?  Its much better to be cool later in life.  The metrosexual has given away to the technosexual.  I try to fake my own death to ensure the survival of the company.  An initiation ritual that emerged is agents getting their driver's license photos in uniform.

Question from the audience: what are you doing to engage with the blogosphere?

I'm here because a blogger invited me to participate in the conversation.  Bloggers are great, but don't behold themselves to the same thing as journalists.  I have 25 people who we call public defenders, who get emails and calls, sometimes they are negative.  I'll scan podcasts and posts and give people who have bad experiences a call.  They don't expect it.  Respond to every single one.  I've given my mobile number to most of the bloggers you are talking about.  KNBC did another sting operation last week and we were the only ones without a problem and I'll be sending letters out to everyone in that store saying to keep up the vigilance. Companies are stronger when public on privacy, nobody sued YouTube until they were bought by Google.  The media is predictable and we will pretend every computer that doesn't come in with a hard drive cable connected it came from Dateline.

February 03, 2008

Wiki Wednesday: Challenges in Creating Customer Facing Wikis

We have a special guest and topic for Wiki Wednesday this week.

Companies are engaging wikis to create customer communities and managing customer relationships, usually to capture customer ideas for new products and services or to provide support for existing ones. Creating customer facing wikis can be challenging and easily results in failure or only marginal success. Reviewing several cases of customer facing wikis, the presentation draws conclusions about success and failure factors in the implementation of customer facing wikis.

Christian Wagner is Professor of Information Systems at City University's Information Systems Department. He received his Ph.D. in Business Administration from the University of British Columbia in 1989. Thereafter he spent seven years as a faculty member at the University of Southern California, before joining City University in January 1996. Wagner specializes in the development and study of decision support systems, creativity support, and knowledge management with wikis and weblogs.

The event is a brown bag lunch at Socialtext in Palo Alto.  Sign up on the wiki, Facebook or Upcoming.org.

February 01, 2008

I'm a California Voter for Obama and not a Super Delegate

When I cast my ballot for Barak Obama in California's primary election on Tuesday, my vote will count.  But not how you might expect and we may not have a winner until the Convention.  From Time Magazine:

Translated into English, Rule 13-B means that any candidate who gets more than 15% of the vote in any primary will win convention delegates in direct proportion to his or her percentage of the popular vote.

Translated once more — and, this time, into harder-headed politics — it means that if they can stay in the race, both Obama and Clinton will continue to rack up convention delegates through the spring, regardless of who comes in first in each state. A second-place finish still gets you delegates. Which means that for either candidate to secure the 2,025 delegates needed to capture the nomination could take much longer than either campaign has bargained for.

Under Rule 13-B, it is possible that Clinton and Obama (and Edwards if he can stay competitive) simply carve Super Tuesday's nearly 1,700 delegates up three ways. With delegate-rich states such as California, New York, New Jersey and Illinois up for grabs, that is easy to imagine. Or Clinton and Obama could split the delegate haul in roughly equal fashion. If either of those things happen, the unprecedented national primary unfolding on February 5 won't determine much of anything at all. Except that the race will go on. And every delegate up for grabs after that becomes even more valuable to all sides.

Sounds like Florida all over again.  But perhaps more interesting.

Of the 4,000 delegates to the Democratic National Convention, 20% are "unpledged" with the ability vote for anyone regardless of the popular vote.  These Super Delegates constitute a swing vote that hasn't been tested before.

Rick Klau set up a wiki for open research on Super Delegates, to help people understand the issue and gauge preferences going into the convention.

Attention Yahoos!

Socialtext is hiring

Fortune 500 Business Blogging Wiki

The F500 Business Blogging Wiki, which I started with Chris Anderson, is evolving into more than an open directory of what big companies are blogging publicly.  John Cass and Easton Ellsworth have adopted and extended it to include reviews of Fortune and Global 1000 corporate blogging strategies.

I like how the format encourages bloggers to cross-post, such as this review GM by Liz Fuller.

Microo!

The $45B acquisition of Yahoo! by Microsoft will probably go through and the broader implications aren't just about search and advertising.  If Microsoft uses up its war chest on this one big bet, it is on consumer markets to find its next cash cow.  This of course will not have a short term impact on its enterprise business, but it does say something about its relative future. 

While people are quietly mourning the implications for Silicon Valley, I actually think this move will open up new spaces for startups, although reducing some of the acquisition demand.  Others are mourning the implications for Yahoo's open source projects.  But I have to wonder if there is an upside of cultural injection.

Overall, this was Ballmer's way to give an answer to the Street for the one repeated question that drove him nuts.  Now I wonder if Google is feeling lucky.  And the same question for enterprise software giants.

Feeds


Flickr


  • www.flickr.com

Dandelife


Ligit

About


  • Ross Mayfield is the Chairman, President & Co-founder of Socialtext, the first wiki company and leading provider of Enterprise 2.0 solutions,
My Photo

The 150



  • View Ross Mayfield's profile on LinkedIn
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003