« January 2004 | Main | March 2004 »

February 2004

February 29, 2004

Budding Entrepreneurship

If you were about to graduate from college and had an interest in becoming an entrepreneur, what would you do?

That's the gist of an I received in an email from Taylor Brooks, an entrepreneurship major pondering the big questions and asking for advice. With permission, I am answering this openly and hopefully drawing in better experts than myself.

Change your major. I am kidding, but seriously, the best undergraduate studies can give you are critical thinking and communication skills. Entrepreneurship can give you exposure to concepts of risk so you might take the right ones. But surveying different disciplines from politics to art to science gives you different ways to look at the world, helps you understand different people and makes life more enjoyable. Innovations and business opportunities happen where disciplines collide.

Start a business. Lots of people will give you advice to just get out there and start doing it. The smallest of ventures will teach you big things.

Connect with the Net. Your business doesn't have to be in Tech, in fact, most things are not. But dorm room ventures that leverage the Net can produce, market and distribute with a minimal investment. You don't have to be Michael Dell to do this. Even a simple service with a web front-end can get you going. And in absence of code, elbow grease will get you a long way.

Take responsibility beyond your years. I have never had a job I have been qualified for. Strive to put yourself in difficult situations. Go work with a non-profit, where they treat and trust interns as full-time employees out of necessity.

Go abroad. Not only is the world a very big place and has much to teach us, but expatriates are given greater responsibility because who you are is of greater difference. Go teach and practice entrepreneurship in a developing country.

Experiment at the margin. This is what Al Osborne at Anderson, my professor of entrepreneurship, says entrepreneurs do. Start with what you know and can do, then extend it a little bit. Right now you at least know the market of students and their parent's money. Tweak the idea, implement, take stock and tweak again. Iterate.

Have fun with failure. Make mistakes and make them often. Make them early, because the only consequence decisions have early in life is what you learn from them. Persist.

Take time for strategy. When you are in the midst of blocking and tackling, its hard to step back and gain perspective. Understanding trends and focusing your mission can not only save you time, but even save your business.

Pay yourself. Its so easy to forget to pay yourself when you are driven by passion, but don't forget that is why you are working.

Service the desire. When I was a kid I bought a book, "how to make money with your Apple II+," written by some other kid. None of the business ideas made sense to me. Except publishing that book.

Do different. No matter what you do, do your own thing. Differentiation is perhaps the most important attribute of a successful venture. Not just for standing out in a crowded marketplace, but doing the little things inside the company in a way that is better than your competition. And if you can't invent a great positioning or process, you can always excel at personal service.

Work with good people. Life is too short for anything else, and good people do good things.

Stick to ethics. Money isn't worth getting into trouble or ill repute. And you will soon find out how small the world really is and how it iterates upon you.

Be a businessperson. In his last years, my grandfather told me: the difference between an entrepreneur and a businessman is that while an entreprenuer is in it for the fast buck, a businessman makes a lasting contribution to his community. Times and terminology have changed, but the difference between a social entrepreneur and a self-interested entrepreneur has not.

Start a weblog. Had to say it, see below, follow the links, you get the idea. Have a learning journey with other people. I would recommend a bunch of books, but get to them in context.

Now by some measures, I'm not an expert, just a guy passing on a few learnings of my own. I'm hoping that some of the Entrepreneurs and VCs in blogspace can chip in their own.

All Hail the Writers

Spent the past few days contributing a chapter for a forthcoming book on Emergent Democracy. My new mantra:

Its time to put the demo back in democracy. One link at a time.

Its been refreshing to focus on a long piece, especially one that reflects upon posts from the past. But for all those people who write books for a living, I have to hand it to you. Compared to writing for blogs, articles and business -- its really a hard chore. And I really have to admire authors that can put energy into both blogs and books.

What's worse, you don't get the immeadiate gratification that comes from posts. I still have the editing process to work through and then they have to do all that printing and distribution stuff.

I contributed to a book before, on bandwidth trading, but found and entirely new experience this time. Being able to source from past blog posts was a tremendous accelerator as well as a rewarding journey back in time. If time permitted, I would have posted sections for feedback during the process to vet things out. Better yet, write openly in wiki. Perhaps next time.

February 25, 2004

Blogalyst

What's a Blogalyst? Part blogger, part analyst and part catalyst.

Wicked (Good) Wikis

Blogalyst Stowe Boyd has a seriously great article on wikis in Darwin. Its a good intro to wiki, compares them with weblogs, highlights their emergent properties and role as social tools.

...Wikis are built upon an inherently open model of social interaction and collaboration, with very little constraint placed on the participants. In a sense, this puts the onus back on the members of a project group to self-police: to build structure out of the minimalist forms of Wiki components, to correct others' grammar, syntax and wrong-headed arguments, to cajole others to your viewpoint or ideas where the project should be headed. But it's exactly this frisson between partners, affiliated around shared purpose, that builds social ties and generates social capital. Wikis directly support us in our efforts to get more from the whole than the sum of the parts.
Stowe also bases his views upon using Socialtext in the context of a workshop where he actively collaborated with other participants.
The specific Wiki technology that we applied for the workshop was provided by Socialtext. Taking a step forward toward the socialized enterprise, their exemplary technology includes blogs right in the framework of the basic Wiki tools. This combination of complementary social tools is much more powerful than using the two technologies in parallel but unintegrated.

I was especially struck by the value of real-time Wikiing, as a running sidebar to the presentations and direct interaction in the workshop. At any given time, several of the 30-odd workshop attendees were capturing their own streams of consciousness or the comments of others, and it was obviously the case that Wikis have an amazingly steep learning curve, since many were total novices to Wikis. (Note: steep learning curves are the best sort, despite the conventional mistaken notion about them. A steep learning curve means you learn something quickly, not that something is difficult.)


Stowe has been following this space for some time now. He shared with me a copy of an old report of his on Social Tools from back during the boom. What changed since then was the ability to unleash emergent intelligence inside an organization without requiring side-activities, but fulfilling real needs for people to work together in simple ways.

Blogs for Professional Advantage

John Battelle's collumn at Business2.0 suggests that blogs will become a staple of business (reg. req.):


So here's my prediction: Blogs will soon become a staple in the information diet of every serious businessperson, not because it's cool to read them, but because those who don't read them will fail. In short, blogs offer an accelerated and efficient approach to acquiring and understanding the kind of information all of us need to make business decisions...

Until recently, blogs have proven to be an incredibly lousy source of information for most businesspeople. Finding and keeping up with the relevant ones is far too time-consuming. But I've recently started using a newsreader, and after spending hours setting the damn thing up, my business life has changed forever.

He is right for two reasons: first exposure to blogs is as a reader and like all great disruptive technologies they provide competitive advantage to individual early adopters.

Same dynamics drive team leaders to bring blogs and wikis inside to create advantage for workgroups. Some team members initially participate as readers, but gradually shift to being contributors and collaborators.

[via Stowe]

February 22, 2004

Guestblogging on M2M: Amy Jo Kim

Amy Jo Kim is guestblogging on Many-to-Many. Check out her emergent purpose.

February 21, 2004

Next Next Generation

The coming influence of Net-Gens (14-24 year olds) with their multi-modal and connected ways is well expected and studied. But what about 7-14 year olds, the Next Next Generation?

The problem with Children and Social Software is the balance between letting them express themselves and privacy. In California, well intended regulations make it almost impossible to have children use, let alone create something on the Internet.

So where do the kids blog? Either from home under supervision or Think.com. Under an Oracle grant, any K-12 school in the US & UK can provide kids blogs, email, social networking and group collaboration for free. All password protected, available in three languages and with pilots underway in Chile, Thailand, New Zealand and China. Its a pretty great project attempting to balance significant stakeholder issues to let kids learn socially:

Think.com - version 3 new features include a "Parent Page" and buddy lists. Using the "Parent Page" teachers can now post homework assignments, class calendars, permission slips and much more for parents to easily access. Buddy lists let kids see when their friends are on line and allow them to quickly send email or navigate to their "buddy's" web page. Email functionality has been enhanced, giving schools the choice to block all attachments, turn off external email, and monitor messages for bad language.

Perhaps the only perk my 7-year old daughter gets from being the CEO's daughter (aside from being dragged to conferences while being told its a vacation), is her own workspace to blog privately. Of course, if I'm sitting around with my laptop, her first question is "Daddy, can I post to my weblog." She is pretty excited about it, maybe thinks she has more than one reader and her posts may be a treasure for her one day. I would open it up, but I also get Google traffic for distrubing queries like "pictures of my daughter."

Great to see social software for kids through schools, but sitting down with them to let them explore can't be beat.

February 17, 2004

Collapse of Information Markets?

Jeff Jarvis picks up on the work of Columbia professor Eli Noam, who predicts that the information sector will collapse due to commoditization.

...we need to recognise that the entire information sector - from music to newspapers to telecoms to internet to semiconductors and anything in-between - has become subject to a gigantic market failure in slow motion. A market failure exists when market prices cannot reach a self-sustaining equilibrium. The market failure of the entire information sector is one of the fundamental trends of our time, with far-reaching long-term effects, and it is happening right in front of our eyes.

The basic structural reason for this problem is that information products are characterised by high fixed costs and low marginal costs. They are expensive to produce but cheap to reproduce and distribute, and therefore exhibit strong economies of scale with incentives to an over-supply. Second, more information products are continuously being offered to users. And information products and services are becoming more "commodified", open, and competitive.

The main result of these factors is that prices for content, network distribution and equipment are collapsing across a broad front. It seems to have become difficult to charge anything for information products and services...

Jeff rightly points out that demand for information is elastic (although there are the constraints of attention) the costs of production are falling as well as cost of distribution. The industry is shifting from economies of scale and speed to that of span and scope. To describe this in industry parlance, margins come from versioning and bundling (scope) and aggregation (span). Somewhere in the span, the line between producer and consumer is being blurred. New combinations of goods are further decommoditized through the very act of consumers participating in production. But all products and industries trend towards commoditization, embrace it.

UPDATE: Kevin Werbach rightly points out that syndication is a business model that embraces the trend of commoditization to its own advantage.

February 16, 2004

The Secret Sauce of the Explosive Cocktail

Loïc Le Meur reflects upon the Etech conference to come up with the secret sauce of an unwired conference (go read the descriptions):

-Prepare the sauce ingredients on a wiki and let it grow during the conference
-Make wifi and juice available everywhere
-Gather some of the most authoritative bloggers and mix them with baby bloggers
-Add a lot of Apple juice
-Add a conference moblog
-Open a conference chat room
-Project the chat room when the panel talks
-Create a trackback link for all conference sessions so that people can find quickly what bloggers think and say about the sessions
-Technoratize the sessions so that people can also see what bloggers say about the conference.
-Manage the side effects
-The participants will create even the programme of the conference
-The participants will self organize conferences, using tools such as meet-up

Essentially, this is what Socialtext Eventspace brings to an event, without having participants have to have their own blogs, Macs or Docs.

Of course, this first time exposure leads people to start their own blogs, switching to Mac is worth it, there is no substitute for a real Doc and every event reveals a new conference blogger.

If you want it to be less explosive, pick and choose the ingredients. But now that Wifi has become a standard event requirement, you can leave it to the regular conference bloggers or let everyone participate.

UPDATE: Conference blogging in action at Demo 2004.

February 14, 2004

Echo is Feedback

Joi makes the case that the echo chamber effect in blogspace has a positive attribute and is not communal censorship. Essentially, creative and social networks deliberate to construct fit memes.

Related, Kevin Marks and Tantek Çelik developed Vote Links to reveal the bell curve of opinion.

It will be interesting to watch how deliberation in smaller groups can be augmented by Vote Links to accelerate new emergent patterns, as well as how the A-list uses them as new listening tools.

Open Source Methods

Prospect Magazine writes about how open source methodologies are spreading beyond software development. Including the example of Wikipedia as commons-based peer production.

Wikipedia is Wales's second attempt at creating a public domain reference work. For his first attempt, Nupedia, he insisted potential contributors provide credentials before they could participate. After two years he had 12 articles to show for his efforts. Contributors just couldn't be bothered with the rigmarole of identifying themselves. So Wikipedia has no controls. Anyone can visit the site and create or edit an entry. You might think this is a recipe for mayhem. In fact, it provides for an open peer review of every article.

February 13, 2004

Etech Disco

Posted other pictures in Events

Weblogs for State Government

David Fletcher picks up on Disney Enterprise Weblogs and Wikis and notes:


Like Disney, the State of Utah is using weblogs for a variety of purpose, including content management, customer contact management, news services, etc. and has even more on the drawing board.  It provides a VERY cost effective solution for many business needs.

The application for state governments, particularly with their budget constraints, is fairly ideal.

February 11, 2004

Post Your Notes

Do everyone a favor and post your Etech session notes on this wiki page.

Its starting to become a great resource.

February 10, 2004

End of Line

Sitting in a self-organizing session on categorizing weblogs after a fine dinner with good friends. I'm outta here tomorrow AM. Too many days on the road, too little time with the kids, too little time for the other kinds of work.

Been a pleasure conference blogging with you. Back to real life.

Transcendental Social Networking

Stewart Butterfield and Co with some really groovy stuff. Motto: Don't build application, build contexts for interaction.

The architecture of entertainment has been shaped by the idea of Immersion. Play is about people, not places [Thumbs Up] to this. Architecture emerges out of play.

Badge -> Graph -> Scrape -> game/blog context -> Neighborhood browser -> Neverending blogroll ->

App-based -> Document-based -> Relationship-based Computing (BooYaa!)

Flickr. Saw this social networking photo sharing application last night and it simply rocks.

Instant chat. Groups are objects. Using the social network as a whitelist. You get the idea (when you see it).

Disney Enterprise Weblogs and Wikis

Mike Pusateri, Elisabeth Freeman and Eric Freeman at Disney shares their enterprise blogging initative. Its very similar to the experience we have had with Socialtext, without the integration of blog and wiki with enterprise requirements in mind. The focus on blogging for project communication instead of just individual expression is spot on.


Using RSS for content distribution

Using RSS Enclosures to deliver video to 2 million broadband users. Some argue that enclosures don't scale and their not enough bandwidth, but >500M videos have been delivered in less than one year an dhav been able to scale bandwidth to demand, now moving towards caching at the edge. Most of the delivery is off-peak hours, especially from them to the cable head end, so bandwidth cost is nominal. P2P like Bittorrent and others may broaden this.

Enterprise Blogging

In ops/engineering there are 100 people that log into the 6 weblogs. In DIG, 1 blog and 50 users, the wiki has been over 1.5 year 200 users and lots of groups.

Mike works where coordination is king. Info flow between programming, marketing, traffic and operations, etc. Consistent flow is critical, constant change occured and must be communicated, catch up must happen easily or problems result, archives. People don't like loggingm dont know whats new and difficult to forward.

Shift Logs
* 24 hour positions necessitate the creation of a shiftr log to report information to coworkers and management about what occured on the shift
*Previous solution was specialized FoxPro database with minimal features, mot even search
* Now a MT-based group blog

Distribution
* New weblog styel were popularm but requests for email of entries began
* Instead of email notification, used RSS
* Newsgator chosen as aggregator because of the outlook plugin

Discrepancy Reports
*Detailed info on mistakes, problems or opther events that affect the broadcast
*RSS feed reduced use of email

Ratings Information
* Daily need for overnight ratings information
* Generating RSS feed that encloses a styled table

Furture
*News Clopping Service (currentl web app)
* Playdate Memor changes (currently email
*Addition of RSS feeds to existing intranet portal modules
* Use of ATOM to replace RSS (when 1.0 arrives) and compliant tools for simple publishing. Because it is inherently 2-directional, for interaction
* Syndication of some media content for review

Conclusions
*RSS feeds and Weblog software are useful for multitude of business need where information flow is critical. Its not about opinion its about information flow
* RSS feeds are for much more than weblog sndication
*Use of RSS feeds is inexpensive comparatively
*RSS aggregation into Outlook integration was critical.
*Client side aggregation needs to move toward server side aggregation
*Need for authentication is immeadiate

They also use wikis inside. Disney Internet Group is also using wikis and blogs

*Wide variety of areas of expertise within our group
* Each person can contribute research and articles of interest to the entire group
* Best shared through a system that will notify, Notifications have had an impact -- email and RSS
* Did some stylizing per group
* Repurpose internal datafeeds
*Had training sessions to get it going.

Reuters uses wikis instead of blogs as it was harder to adopt.

Problem security and authentication; provisioning new spaces and resources. Disney has restricted write access, but not read access. Comment from a person at the BBC affirmed they ran into this in some areas too. They don't have Socialtext's ability to manage and work with lots of workspaces.

Fluidtime

Fluidtime: synching time coordination and social networking.


The Fluidtime project wants to contribute to a society where people's activities flow into each other, where there is less waiting and more time for contemplation and idling and where people flow with their time and not against it.

We do this by stimulating debate, developing methods and creating services and tools for event based timing.

We want to link people to the 'real' time of events and appointments through interfaces that are simple and effective.

Time coordination, time personalities, social network roles, tools, event types, location and changes. Robert Levine: The geography of time. Clock time vs. fluid time.

Showing patterns within SMS coordination

Time manager: coordinates
Connector: connects and bridges
Juggler: plan and act, but will move as needed
Time opportunist: Doesn't plan ahead, but will be opportunists
Time squanderer: nuff said

A really cool project that I would love to learn more about, but I need to go sit in Liz's session on misbehaviour, or I'll get in trouble with the stronger sex.

Enterprise Whuffie

Steve Gillmor's eWeek collumn on Messaging and Collaboration covers Socialtext and the nature of relationships in enterprise social software.

He quotes my term for Google's social networking service Orkut, "frictionless whuffie fun," and relates the role of relationships within the enterprise. Steve mentions our work inside the Dean campaign for decentralized news analysis (no longer active) and provides his own insight into how our support for RSS lets users work in harmony with other tools.

...Ross Mayfield, CEO at social software maker Socialtext, calls these new social networks "frictionless whuffie fun." But whuffie, a colloquial measure of digital reputation, speaks to the fundamental problem confronting social networks: How do you establish trust over the public network and make group formation and information sharing more secure and efficient?

...As IM and RSS end points have mushroomed, so too have the requirements for prioritizing and managing access to those information streams. The Dean campaign employed SocialText software and 400 volunteers for decentralized news analysis, clipping and annotating blogs, and traditional media posts. SocialText marries several social software precepts: the Wiki information store, automated authenticated blog generation and RSS output for change notification.

Wiki software runs on a server and lets users create and edit Web page content using any browser. At its best, Wiki software captures the informal but often critical forms of conversation such as those that might occur around the water cooler. The conversation can be logged, accessed by team members in self-managing threads and indexed by links so that hardware indexing engines such as Google appliances can derive useful results from internal as well as external searches.

Steve coins a cool term, Enterprise Whuffie, which beats KM to me:

At stake in all this: enterprise whuffie, the reputation of importance that employees would be able to acquire by becoming known as experts in different areas. The value of any knowledge management system depends on the amount of knowledge that employees put into it. A corporate manager may demand participation as terms for employment, but information hoarders often route around this by sharing it only in non-recorded situations. However, the all-important whuffie would be a powerful incentive for sharing information more broadly.

But a payoff even greater than enterprise whuffie will emerge as groups begin to manage themselves without IT involvement. Today's social software is a big step in that direction, using browser-based tools to create Wiki pages and blogs simply by typing in a name and, in SocialText's case, allowing RSS aggregators such as NetNewsWire to track changes with color-coded edits.


Edemo Reflections

Yesterday's sessions were fantastic. Enjoyed listening, learning and backchanneling -- a little frustrating not being able to pontificate. Some key takeaways:

  • A year ago this week we had the first Happening, the term Emergent Democracy was coined and Joi flushed out his paper. Amazing to think how far this field has come in a short year.
  • Incredibly encouraging to hear the practitioners like Trippi and Boyd well versed in growing body of work (post-by-post) of Emergent Democracy
  • Reading between Trippi's comments, it seems he is starting a Unity Movement. A citizen funded PAC that can both mobilize resources against Bush, mediate technical transitions between campaigns and leverage an constituency. Note that Boyd said he isn't getting into blogs until after 2004 and there is lots of room for others. The Movement will move forward and be web-based.
  • Some interesting talk about the barriers of transitioning open source developments between campaigns. Sure the source can shift, but its the people who have invested themselves in it that can be the barrier or the opportunity. Its actually harder to do than with vendors that have to serve anybody according to campaign laws.
  • Some really good people from the different democratic campaigns were here confirming relationships to transition and work together. Co-opetition that will make a real difference.
  • The blogging panel did focus on blogging as punditry too much, a perfect contrast to Joi and Ethan's panel which emphasized social use and the skinny tail of the power law.
  • Good talk that there should be an Edemo event in Europe this year. Some major politicians in England and France are starting to blog, the Dean case popularized potential and it will have an impact upcoming elections.
  • Good talk about the need to serve local politics
  • Adina should run for office one day.
  • Mike picked on an interesting difference between press and blog coverage.

Adding some links to what Doc has collected: Phil, Jeff Jarvis, The Eyeranian, Tim Oren, Scott Rosenberg, Joi Ito, JD Lasica, Justin Hall, Many2Many, Ross Mayfield, Jon Lebkowski, Danah Boyd, Plasticbag, Wired News, Techdirt, and the DDTI's own aggregation page. Also Moblogged.

iRobot

Helen Greiner, CEO of iRobot, which is making robots subsurvient to us.

X, Y, and Z...and its a Robot!

Technology: Navigation (coverage algorythms, wall following, edge detection), Cleaning (edge cleaning, transition, low power) and Agressive IP protection. Had to innovate around issues of infrared.

"Don't want to get into an infinite loop, introduce some randomness, and if all else fails, do something else" -- good advice for people as well as robots.

Innovation: Robots are a completely unique class of systems: a car isn't a hresless buggy, something integral had changed, the deep change has allopwed functionality like speed distance and convenience.

What is the deep change? Sensing tied tothrough intelligent algorithms to action, behavior control lets us build up competencies. Robots respond to the world, not a model of the world.

Coverage Per Room (CPR), nice metric.

Future developments are Auto-Appliances, No Hassle Maintenance and Human Assistance and Care.

Military applications reminded me of a midget tossing contest. Wonder if they have a patent pending alogrithm for compassion.

O'Reilly Radar

I've heard this talk a couple of times, so Im just listening for something new and cool Timisms. One bit of commentary, its great that wikis are on the O'Reilly Radar, but there is an even better reason for it to be than people simply using and talking about them. Wikis are the one tool that will bring the hacking culture to the masses.

Innovative hacks eventually become parts of platforms, even Windows.

Still thinking of the new killer apps of the Internet. Amazon, Google, etc. New world where software is somewhere else. Internet is the platform, built on on open source, services, exploring platform moves with APIs, aggregators not just software, user contributions key to market dominance.

Fabl.net/WWMX vs. Mapquest -- making applications social..."the mapping service that gets user participation right is going to win in a big way"

New activity in using the Net to mobilize people.

Orkut..I actually want friendship to meen something.

What's particular about wikis are that they are easy. A world writable website. People actually use them responsibly.

Wordspy -- the neologism tracker. MobileWhack. iTunes is the most developed in pulling together many themes: concieved as a multi device application, database back end, web services, rich client, mobile devices, rendezvous...but not yet collaborative or "architecture of participation":


  • No user provided content
  • iPoto now supports rendezous, but GarageBand doesn't
  • Data sharing protocols woefully limited - every app ought to be a source of web services
  • Doesn't allow group formation: e.g. Orkut, managing relationships -- id isn't about me, its about me and you -- isn't P2P the right answer for this kind of data? Some real advances could address and namespace data area...Microsoft, Nokia or somebody should be thinking.

Network-enabled Market Research by NetCraft, Map of the Market, Netscan, Technorati. Alexa View of Orkut.

Valdis's Clustering of Book Purchase Patterns research wins the Most Mentioned Award so far with the conference, especially yesterday.

Strong correlation of Adword Pricing vs. Book Sales. Book market: 51% Windows, 23% Mac, 18% Linux, 3% Handhelds -- very different from market share of operating systems. All developer book sales are trending down, mostly because of outsourcing.

The current radar is about hackable architectures that realize network effects.

February 09, 2004

Emergent Democracy Worldwide

Joi and Ethan's notes/links about the talk

Between indirect and direct democracy is something more intelligent, direct democracy doesn't scale.

Ethan is our token African for the day. We have come to praise EDemo, not bury it. Between Joi's paper and Jim's paper:
1. Changing how we get information
2. Changing how we debate
3. Changing perspectives

Blogs are giving new perspectives. For large chunks of the world; we can't rely on citizen journalists in the middle of Africa. So we depend on the media.

With blogs, when you are in a pinch, we don't care and you don't matter.

AllAfrica.com. Resources and caring are excuses for why media doesn't cover it, but they are attributes for blogs.

Ethan: We have limited representation because of access, time, cost and language. How can we structure debates to increase participation.

Witness.org. Bloggers will work issues through the layers. A-list as the amplifyer. The skinny tail of power law is where the interesting thing, the gituar.

The Backchannel is too fun for me to blog this further.

Seriously, go browse the links of the world. Its a big place.

Advocacy as an Application

Democracy as an operating system and advocacy as an application. Also creating a framework and and operating system to support various kinds of advocacy.

Jon Lebkowsky, Polycot consulting
William Greene, Rightmarch.com (the opposition of MoveOn.org)
Adina Levin, Socialtext, EFF-Austin, ACLU Cyberliberties Project; interested in connecting online media with tools to get things done
Cory Doctorow: EFF, hound of crap Architecture is politics and works to keep fundamental freedoms in, moving to Brussels to work on WIPO
Jonah Siger: organizer of campaigns since 1995, EFF, Center for Democracy & Technology, IPDI.org, recovering Titan and starting a new company in the space

Jonah: need to understand the business model and message for the applications. Blogspace as an evolution of usenet? Meetup as an innovative business model and application. Message becomes most important. How do you lead and follow at the same time? Bring a message that resonates? The tools are 5/10ths of the solution, the application is a tiny part of advocacy, you need clarity of message to get people to participate. If you want to change public opinion, you have to have messages that resonate.

Cory: Architecture is politics. Lots of us saw the Internet as something that could resist harmful regulation (the myth of the pure energy being), but we are tied to juristiction. Ignore government and regulation at your peril. 70% of the Internet goes through the US, mostly through 2 data centers. You have to get involved in meatspace, don't be a nerd fatilist or determinist. Kevin Werbach opened up the FCC 300k letters in 24 hours, no expiry date and there are still messages coming in. The administrative branch needed a way to handle citizen comments, the Forestry Department given power, they now filter out substantively similar messages. The architecture to bifurcate the commenting system of ones that are given and not given attention is policy as architecture created without due process. Across the spectrum people were against this, and it has been withdrawn. Substantively different comments do make a difference. They make lawmakers sit up and pay attention. No one can afford to avoid 1M comments. Now the issue is coming back, the IEEE is creating a technical standard for public comments. They tried to bring in experts to show how the technical standards were flawed, but then they played proceedural games, then IEEE members used an action center like tool and then the excecutives changed. Progress happens. Determinism and defeatism don't prevail.

Adina: Applying the same principles at the local level. You can still win at the end stage at a long game, but there is an advantage if you play at the beginning of the game. Mentors in the local ACLU helped take their understanding of the technology and tech policy, used technology to form groups, to play the game right. To pursuade local decision makers: effective communication is 20 points, 20 points if you give them the illusion of a check in support, 10 points of you come without a check but physically showing up, phone call is 2 points, email is about 1 point. Show up in person, they will listen. Organize online, learn the process and show up in person.

William: Outsourcing (to India?) the back end of contact forms to Capital Advantage. Blast faxing and other functions can be scaled in this way. Have been doing this for 3-4 years.

Jonah: The black page protest of 1996 as an example of advocacy as an application.

Cory: Something for hackers

Adina: blogs and wikis for organizing in house; to comprehend, analyze and respond quickly

Moveon.org Wes Boyd

Broadcast culture, wants the narrative, which needs conflict which results in conflict for conflict sake. Keeps us from doing democracy, we have to do it too. Cynicism, attack and defend culture prevents good people from being politicians.

Membership started with a petition, first four days:

  • 334
  • 1506
  • 9332
  • 2376

Imagine direct mail, but its free. In 2000 raised $2.3 Million for PAC.

Having members drive issues. In 2001 Top Issues: Finance Reform, Energy/Environmental.

After 9-11 international issues came to the fore, questioned their role. People rushed to war, didn't have a way to express that. The time of vacume when the political establishment isn't addressing things is when the network can play a role. Communications technology can heal breaches between the establishment and constitutencies. User base tripled. With 48 hours, $40k raised for a NY Times ad...TV..billboards...and then war happened.

Question was if people would support more than war as an issue. We had no idea that people were steamed about leaders in Washington about media. Brought real citizens in to speak with representatives about media consolidation.

The ability to use technology to help self-organizing is phenomenon. Differs from Meetups where they pull leadership into the picture. Virtual March on Washington to schedule calls into congress.

Emerging Public Mind has organizations play a role as centers within this set of connections. Supports organizations coming together, something you don't hear when reading about Emergent Democracy. Happened in days for the war.

Global Vigil for Peace organized in 4 days. My role is to say "yeah!" the yes we can do it message (emergent leadership). What led the NY Times writer to use the term "Second Superpower."

Leadership -> Listen -> Strong vision. Big Ears

You have to figure out ways to listen, say things that are sensible and moderate in this media. Monitors discussion groups, best thread, rated posts

Leadership -> Serve -> dedication

Leadership -> Trust -> that people are not stupid and will do good work and will step up

The talent isn't in DC. Despite the Hiter ad instance, trust and move on.

Leadership -> Engage -> every time they engaged people it created an inflection point

Someone used the idea of political capital and it damaged the system forever (a great point, makes me second guess using the term social capital, although its harder to hoard)

Leadership -> Connect

Emergent Democracy: its not direct democracy or representative democracy Connection is the underlying thing that creates a vibrant and diverse system -- his core political believe. There is an emergent public mind. But what is its nature? What can we do to have a happy ending?

Shows some of the Bush in 30 Seconds ads. Randomly chose 20 a day, allowed voting and the best stuff emerged to the top. We have a lot of really funny stuff that is actually fairly centrist. (the ones he showed didn't seem to centrist).

"We have this theory that what comes from us will resonate in general," very different from Washington's segment and conquer approach. Tested the winner against focus groups and it polled off the charts.

On George Soros, meet and greet initially, now he is doing matching funds of 1:2.

Kevin Burton: Blog?

They will blog after 2004. An issue of having content on the site. Opposition research goes through what you publish. For now its the online forum and email. The alternative is to have links to other discussions.

What he should do is to start a blog that only excerpts and links to other blogs, which will catalyze others

There is frequently things you don't see on the site. For example congressional activities in different activities.

Flying Toasters: Jack Eastman did a 4 frame animation and needed content to show and walked in his kitchen and sketched it. He said, "ship it"

Don't make a logo with little people on it. People are not little.

We will never sell/rent the email list, prescribed under our privacy policy. Copyright hasn't been thought through enough.

Jay Rosen: Reality Check Fund: Mutual fund for public interest journalism that attracts project and supports off-beat investigative journalism.

You wouldn't believe how much of a vacume exists in the sector, lots of opportunity for others.

Tim: How do you get the dialogue across the divide?

You pull people in not through extreme partisan rhetoric, but civil discourse I wish people would do some work to find out what is really going on. We are not feeling the classical pull to the center. We share a great deal, but have an overlay of team behavior.

Kevin Burton: How can we help you?

The technology that underlies emergent democracy...we use our own platform and some open source, but to go forward to look at the tools and techniques...lower the barrier to entry and let it operate at scale.

I'm very concerned that we take political speech on the Internet for granted and we forget that it is a commercial medium. From the standpoint of the law there is no such thing as a public space.

Electronic Voting and Transparency

(I have shifted from Impressionistic Transcription to other modes, need to listen and learn.

Phil Windley, blogger and former CIO of the great State of Utah.

Adina Levin, Socialtext rock star by day, freedom fighter by night.

Bill Stotesbury, Representative Hart Intercivic, an election company first and a technology company first. There is learning to happen on both sides. How to extend accessibility. Comparative risk of electronic voting systems and traditional ones, both have flaws.

Gary Chapman, University of Texas, professor of policy. CPSR: Founded the first public interest organization on the Internet. Shameful that we ended up in the same place we did in Texas after Florida, after 22 years of work. Lots of machines are unsuitable to hold this public role in the United States. Recommends this Salon article from today's issue. He is in favor of verified paper ballots.

Phil: the result of this session should be a call to action. who do you talk to

Adina: How can people in technology make a difference. This is a really live issue, an opportunity to get involved. The voting system was brought in by an act after Florida with $40m. In each state, implementation is at a county-by-county level, pay attention at the county clerk's office for the system, process before and during the election, but their choices are from the secretary of state level. Nevada brought in people from the gaming industry, differs by state. Check the process at the county level. There is a bill at the national level addressing the voter verified paper trail and a better process -- so support it by calling, writing, faxing, visiting your representatives.

Gary: The term electronic voting goes beyond this generation of equipment. How do we ensure that systems are developed with the right standards in use while using them to increase accessibility.

Bill: People don't see differentiation between DRE and Internet voting. The state we are in now is trouble. Its going to standards, law and citizen pressure.

Adina: Voting machines on the market today have some very serious with CS 101 problems (e.g. hard coded password, accessible to sys admins, lack of encryption, hard coded encryption key, some connected to the Internet, smart card systems for the voter and the admin with simple protocols that are easy to fake) -- these machines are certified in lots of states. They wouldn't be certified by your business.

Bill: Most of the vulnerabilities are about access/control, similar problems to paper (running out of ballots, closing polls), electronic creates some kind of audit trail. Comparative risk. Refusing voters is not from a techological base, its a political base.

Gary: With the exception of Diebold, computer specialists should be working with vendors to help. Problems are not new, we just need to improve what we have now.

This is a dense and difficult discussion with lots of material to absorb. This session helped me understand how significant the problem is, how there are some tradeoffs (not everything is technical) and how hopefully some people here will become more involved so someone doesn't steal our votes again.

New Journalism Panel

I something going on that is changing the journalist role? How do we do this better?

Dan: On my right, is Jeff Jarvis, but I won't go into that any further.

Jay Rosen

Teach-ins should teach us things, the most imporant thing we could learn is where we are in time. Joe said 1960 for the same reason Frank Rich did, a year where the power of television became significant. In 1760 we had the birth of the republic where people's opinions count. A large group of people outside of decision making who had an interest in what people were doing -- the opinions of the public mattered -- gave birth to the concept and role of public opinion. Powerful radical idea, egalitarian principles. But within a limited group.

From 1760-1860 the idea was expaned to include everybody in the public. In 1860 we had the birth of mass media, beginning with the penny newspapers. Spread the public to everybody. Lots of commentary that finally the world is connected. Same hopes as the Internet for the telegraph. The role of people converted downward, gained participation, but lost agency. Institutionalization of the public as an audience. By 1960 this moved into politics, media age politics, what Joe called broadcast politics.

Now, the original promise of the public, people who are more than readers, more than ideas -- a role to play in politics. Now the tradition is coming apart. Organizing itself. The Internet had done one thing radical -- it has given the voters a mouth. The public is no longer just on the receiving end.

Jeff Jarvis

I have never seen a time that has been exciting as this. The people own the printing press. The election has changed that the audience has a voice

As blog boy in a suit we say the first obligation is not to go write in blogs, we already have this, the first obligation of the press is to read them. Reporters look at the stump when the should be looking at the green.

Matt Stoller put up the speaches of the three campaigns. All of the information you could want from the candidates is online now. Now political reporting isn't reporting. There isn't value in that. Dean is the first step. We can change the public interaction, amongst ourselves

His manifesto: Would love to see an expectation for webcast. Insist that all candidates have weblogs. Expect that federal and state agencies have equally informative information, a blogger to show what is important, search as easy as Google. Expect politicians will enter into dialogues with us. Reporters should report this, tell politicians what we care about and tell us what politicians are not telling us. Citizens Media, not just weblogs.

Dan: the journalists had a peripheral role in what you just described.

Jay: pro journalists will still be there. What's different is the way journalists can establish authority with us. The terms of authority are changing. Both for the Press, Journalists and the Media. The media is the big attention complex that has a million heads and is a global operation of recruiting and joining audiences. Press is an institution. Need to keep them seperate. The prospects for the media as a collusus are pretty good. The Press arises out our desire to become self-governing people.

Dan: NYT is a political institution, as a great deal to say about how politics is percieved. Just now becoming transparent.

John McCarthy: Lots of people have criticized the press for how it covers public discourse. But there is Yahoo Groups, FreeConference.com (free conference calls), Capital Advantage and League of Women Voters partnership. Political journalists could partner with technology journalists to criticize implementations. How can you as journalists further the technology?

Jeff: There is a story out there, go cover it. Persian blog example.

Jay: Activity comes first. Journalists forgot to care if people were engaged with information instead of receiving the information.

Dan: Journalist needs to do a better job in using and understanding tools. Better tools for people to get information and choose information.

Jay: Pros that can put up information without constraints is significant itself.

IMHO: we dont have video and audio available online to cover the campaign or the ability to treat it as micro-content...a real problem..esp because now we can produce rich media at low cost. (comment that you can use archive.org).

Comment: Corporate vs. corpuscular: eBayization of politics

Jeff: Smart companies do see the value of our audience bringing content to our site

Jay: Its not just disintermedia, its different motivations. Bloggers are doing it for love. Amatuers are a threat because of their differrent motivations.

Dan: Amatuers are not the threat. The threat is eBay, the largest classified ad market, all the descrete revenue streams without needing the large margins.

Tim Bishop: Distain for the mass media?

Dan: No, they compensate me nicely

I asked about the role of quality of emergent media vs. traditional media.

Jay: Blogs are being held more accountable, with a greater level of edvidence and arguementation than an opinion collumn.

Jeff: Blogs can't be co-opted they are just conversations.

Dan: My readers know more than I do.

Political Blogging Panel

3/5 of panelists agreed to join our Board of Advisors. They can't be wrong.

Doc is moderating, but rarely in moderation.

Cameron Barrett: Clark Community Network lets people create and cross-categorize their own blogs. 10k blogs, 300k comments.

David Weinberger: How suprisingly emergent this whole thing is. Anybody having a voice. Was unpredictable the attatchment between bloggers and candidates.

Halley Suitt: I read the blogs I least agree with first in the morning. Discusses her top 10 trends in political blogging: Political blogs are simply political. Regular-people-telling-the-truth-about-their-lives blogs are subversive and radical.. We have nothing more profitable than fear than fear itself. Cheney is president of the moon and wants Bush to be vice-president. Can you smoke community?

Mitch Ratcliffe: DeTocquville's valuing group forming. Recalls when he was covering the president as a member of the press, trying to break through, decided to wait to do it again until there was a new way to cover them that was closer. Political blogs are making a fundamental error to talk about the presidency as a horse race and talking too much about coverage -- this reinforces the mass media's position. If you name the press as the enemy, you give them power. We won't look back on Dean more than McGovern (who innovated direct mail). There have been populist campaigns before. Need to stop being amazed with ourselves

Noticed that all the bloggers are in the front and the political operatives are in the back. They are here, they are just relatively disconnected.

Doc: What happens to the people who are engaged will be working in politics in the future?

Cameron:Would love to see an independent non-profit create a place where people can continue the engagement

David: Political blogs are social, not just informational. Comments disappear below the fold, but this discourages flaming. Most important blogs are about group forming (but this relates to group think).

Halley: Matt Gross noted that some commentors believe they are blogging.

Mitch: Don't worry about the definition of blogging. We fetishize our candidates.

Phil Wolff: What do we do to keep people engaged after the election?

Doc: Local

Cam: Masses are asses, break it down for them

Q: What about the tools?

Cam: Tools differences are not so important

Halley: Political blogs should have a hefty About Me statement

Q: What about adding social networking or other features?

Cam: How to have a voter enter a zipcode to get a map with directions to vote.

Mitch: Don't hang you hat on blogs alone.

Q: Tactical or strategic use? Social use?

Cam: Social is comments (bah)

Q: Legitimacy of blogs vs. traditional journalism

Mitch: Correspondances.org can't get press passes or resources to cover. How to build credentials as well as resources.

Esther: Troubled by the echo chamber. There is nothing that will kill a bad product faster than good advertising. It may be that people didn't like Dean. If you are talking about what makes a blogger effective, its effective at what? It is empowering to talk about something or do something?

Cam: Once you have a blog, you have a voice, but the next step is more involvement.

Esther: What makes people listen to that voice? its not just having a blog its saying something useful.

Doc: You want it to be an echo chamber to some extent. What makes Andrew Sullivan effective is that he crosses boundaries. Valdis' echo chamber map.

David: Getting people to agree with each other is needed for building a political movement. Nothing is wrong with that unless its the only thing that happens. If you want an echo chamber, read the paper, that's the one that worries me.

Mitch: Blogs are just one thing of many. The problem is that we do things like the Dean group did last summer, organizing posse to go after people they are against. The first time Russians saw a pamphlet was one saying the Bolsheviks took power, although it hadn't happened, but it self-fulfilled, people bought it.

Doc: Blogging is the centerpiece of this particular panel.

Q: Blogs inject political dialogue into the Internet. Political is social. What are the metrics for electoral change. IndyVoter.org

Q: How to build consensus? Around a president that is so damn bad. (IRC: Bush has 58% approval at the moment)

Doc: Before the election, there was a blogging movement in support of the war. There is a bigger world out there.

Adina: Comment: Blogs are a medium and a tool and you can use them in different ways, communication to a broad group, more tactical organization using other social software, on the net or Intranet.

Adina: Question: What one step can you think of to take this emergent political activism to take it from online to the real world to cause real change?

Halley: Something happened psychologically when all the bloggers came behind Dean. As if we were reliving a giant dot com bust when it crashed. Need to keep the energy and take it to the local level. Meetups will help. Perhaps we need to stop thinking blogs are the end all be all.

Doc: There are lots of things I want to do that have nothing to do with the blog that are motivated by the blog.

Mitch: If I could use my blog to help people understand that I am valuable to America even if you disagree with me. Perhaps inviting a conservative to participate in the blog with me. Find two people in my neighborhood to go help someone get elected.

Cam: Prior project -- watchblog.com

David: Tremendous urge to connect. Trippi said the Dean campaign tried everything. We should take this technology and truely try everything to unleash that urge to connect.

Doc: Cluetrain feedback: you got it right that markets are conversations, but at a deeper level that markets are about relationships. There is a sense that people have relationships with candidates that they never had before.

Mitch: William Jennings Bryan and other prior candidates where there was the connection, but not on a global scale.

Doc: Open source values to the local government level, a relative new thing.

Adina: When not working for Socialtext, I do issue advocacy with EFF Austin. Provide mentorship for the geeks and help them provide the tools.

Halley: What motivates single mothers is money. Ads on your little old blogs or some source of revenue could be amazing.

Doc: Everything most people know me for happened since he was 50, the blogging made a huge difference, it was transformative.

David: Helps you find your voice, which is the first step.

Jonah Seiger and Scott Heiferman

Jonah Seiger:

Went to high school with Jonah, we both went into politics, I left it for a while and we just reconnected. The great thing is what he is doing is just what's missing from Emergent Democracy.

7% of the General Public are Online Political Citizens.

The Influentials are 10% of the General Public.

70% of Online Political Citizens are Influentials -- this finding says a great deal, not just about bloggers, not just about politics. Its a good finding to generally support how bloggers generally influence.

59% of the people in Iowa use the Internet, 54% in NH, pretty high. More Kerry supporters used the Internet than Dean in both Iowa and New Hampshire. The message matters. He failed to close the deal. He energized people to vote for someone else. Influentials have influence.

Scott Heiferman

Last week was the biggest Dean Meetup yet. Pug madness. Bowling Alone. Latent interest in connecting with people locally. Flipping the bird at the idea of a global village.

The Big Bet: Foo Camp self-organization works.

The Trippi Special: $10 grand! $2,500. Ok. All campaigns bought into the special. What people go to the Meetup for is to learn.

  • 1800s-mid 1900s: Era of Joiners and Organizers, members and chapters
  • Mid 1900s-2004: Era of TV, DC, PACs, DM, Why have members and meetings?" (when you can have Head
  • Now: The era of network powered grassroots

There are meetups automatically generated for everyone running for office.

Defining Democracy, Alexis DeTocqueville, 1831: ...The right of associaltion is the power of meeting...

Double Digit For Decades (DDFD): percentage of Americans at for decades used to go to social meetings.

America Offline.

Joe Trippi

Former Dean Campaign Manager Joe Trippi at Etech:

The press that didn't understand what the campaign was, now sees itself qualified to judge if its a success or not. Broadcast politics has failed us miserably. No debate about the Patriot Act. DMCA isn't being discussed during the mainstream media. Its all on the Internet.

Changing a system thats broken. Back in the 1960s we had the Nixon Kennedy debate, and it took about 5 years to realize that TV was going to change everything. Nobody could guess that it would be race for money, to buy a one-way communications tool that took people out of the process.

The campaign ran into trying to change a system that is locked in place. To believe you can overthrow that system within a 13 month cycle. Dean still has a chance. We have the ability now, there is only one tool, platform and medium that allows people It will not happen on CNN or the LA Times. It will happen when millions of Americans decide to change it together. We don't have health care because of lobbyists.

This is not a dot-com crash, it was a dot-com miracle. Started from nothing to $45m in record fundraising. Previous records set by an sitting president. Dean didn't do it, I didn't do it, you did. No one is going to change America for you, you have to change it yourself. Finally, after being held hostage for 45 years, we now have the beginning of the tools and the platform to take it back yourself.

So many things that went right. Discovered by blog. Meetup.com was discovered by him happening to read a blog (Jerome was blogging that Joe was an idiot) 2 years before Dean was thinking of running. Blog pointed out how the self-organized use. They decided to embrace it.

This was the Internet getting people to do something offline. Its not just the online tools, its the tools online that help people to fulfill that energy offline. The press never understood where the campaign was happening, not on the Tim Russert show, it was at the water cooler.

MoveOn.org taught us quite a bit, best practices. We have a communications problem, the political press has no clue what the Internet is, the put it in their old context. The Internet community doesn't understand the hard cold realities of the political process. This is the problem/disconnect. The media ran the 933 times the scream tape. The out of context portrail.

The Dean thing did work. Because of the people in this room and across the country which brought people into the process. Dean took it on, people responded to him and then competitors followed suit. Dean taught the party how to be an opposition party. Suddenly there was a debate about WMD, a debate that started because of the Internet, which make everyone realize the direction needed. The four remaining candidates are against the war, taking on foriegn policy, regardless of how they previously voted. Populism co-opted. All directly attributable to the campaign. It doesn't matter if the Kerry campaign has taken more lobby money or Dean's grass roots fundraising. Now everybody in the party says we need to end the way money rules our politics.

We have energized (record turnouts, young voters) the democratic party that is taking on the president. What would have happened without Dean? There is a reason Bush is vulerable, its the blogs. Which let the debate happen, which made the other candidates partiticipate, blog, copy tools.

Broadcast politics isn't going to wane. The media jumped the shark on the war, then on the campaign. Democracy is threatened in ways the American people haven't really grasped yet. You cannot have a system that's all about the big money.

Look at the reciepts at the FCC, its the Republican party raises more money by every measure except $1M and above its the Democrats. The Dean Campaign turned this on its head. It is about the money.

We had revolution 1.0 on the 1700s, we are in the beta stage of the 2.0. We finally have the tools to let them say its enough. The people who will give them the tools are in this room. But its still going to be the money.

It only takes a couple of million of Americans to change the entire thing. If 2M Americans decide.

The tools were not there before. It all got built up over time and in 2003 they were finally there. It took coruption to react against. Now everyone is after small dollars. The rest of the campaigns are in wallpaper land, but getting there.

What we need to understand about the political system

Right after Carter became president, the Hunt Commission was formed to happen it would never happen again. Carter got there without the system. So the system was made to prevent that. The cycle of primaries happening faster and faster, retooled every time to prevent an insurgent from getting the nomination. The only hope or best hope was to win Iowa or New Hampshire or both. An establishment candidate would be rolling right hafter . The only way you could stop that from happening was to win early. Gary Hart stumbled into Iowa and then started them on the path. This time the cycle was moved up so even that couldn't happen.


We got Dean to a place that according to the party rules was impossible to get to. There was no institution, only people using tools and the Internet. Now what happened was that we used new and different ways to get there and then we ran into broadcast politics.

Al Gore's endoresment is what happened. Gore is great, but alarm bells went off in newsrooms and campaign headquarters to say kill Howard Dean right now. Because if we don't kill the son of the B right now he will beat us. The media thinking that its their responsibility to beat up on him. Gephart saying he has to win in Iowa, a murder suicide pact, wrecked the Dean campaign with TV ads scaring elder Americans.

Now there is a need to say its failed. Why do they want it to fail? What's so scary about participatory democracy. The dot com crash story is easy, which is what the press does. Unlike a dot com, the Dean campaign made money (shaky analogy itself, campaigns make votes and raise money). What Dean made must survive regardless. The Internet is the most powerful tool put in the hands of the average american. The system has taught them that they don't count. That working in a precinct for four hours is a waste of time. The bigggest hurdle is that the system is so corrupted people don't know they can make a difference. $25 by itself is nothing, but with enough people in concert for the common good its huge. The common good of our country is what makes us powerful. We are at the first stages, if we continue to fight, to make the tools.

I sold my bike for Democracy, an email story. Campaign had nothing to do with it.

Fifty signs went up and the first comment on the blog forgot Puerto Rico, put one up, then someone from London wants one, put one up, a thank you from a woman from Spain. Most everybody in the states on prior campaigns would have a clue how to get a sign. This all happened in 10 minutes it took what would have been 2 months to figure out that there was even a problem with signage.

For a rally in a Park, the idea on the blog was for Dean to carry a red bat if they raised their target. Poor staffer goes and gets a red bat, gets it to him at the last minute, 45 minutes later. Ownership of the campaign by the grassroots. Now we need to build a movement thats owned by the people.

So many people in this room helped us develop tools that helped us (awe, shucks).

He ran Iowa in 2004 for Mondale, orange hat story is rediculous.

The one frustration was given what they were trying to do, we didn't have the luxury of being in different camps. It drove me crazy, but that's the way it was. There has to be a way to get a Unity Movement going.

Ed Cone: What Worked? Got people to the polls?

We need to focus on connecting with people. Meetup worked. Deanlink: the top person to get people to sign up was a 14 year old kid in Alaska, 74 year old retired union worker in Illinois. An 89 year old guy decided the live again by buying a PC, becoming the leader of his Meetup.

How do we use the Net to let people take the tools into their community. The other problem is that its so transparent. Letter writing campaign mechanism was co-opted because its so transparent. What would have prevented Rove from having people sign up to go to Iowa through Dean and then go rob a bank and get caught. How do you know that it was really Dean that wrote that email. Need authentication and identity. All the problems inherent in the net are also true in real politics.

The mistake of the media is thinking that its Internet related.

Ed: Analogy to e-Commerce of incorporating Bricks and Mortar. How well were you able to mesh your organization with traditional ones?

It will be important. Slating delegates. Gore embraced the new and different, but there is another group that doesn't want to give up power. Broadcast media is the only thing that stays no matter what. Hopefully this movement stays.

Ed: What about the stories about your pay?

Reference's Jeff's post. The campaign will put on a million dollar dinner, $2k a plate. You blew $350 to do it. In the Dean campaign we did crazy things, went for $100k in Austin to make bold moves. We don't waste money with galas, at 10% cost we did different things.

I don't know whats offensive, claiming I am a thief or a bad thief. I made $165k in 2003. The LA Times headline was Trippi's firm was paid $7m...to stop the fundraising part of the movement is to claim its corrupted waste. Its how to disintermediate me from the campaign. I didn't have the authority for budget and spending (this is true, Ed Rogan signs the contracts). He and his partner had been managing is media for 7 years and his partner would have been managing it regardless. This is not about getting me, its about how to stop the movement.

How well was the campaign able to incorporate ideas from the grassroots?

One of our biggest problems was making sure you see it all and acting on the best stuff. The idea of having a $3 turkey sandwich (instead of a $2k dinner), Meetup, etc. Doc, David and Brit would help alert to good ideas. Lessig helping Dean guest blog. People thought Dean's blog comments were so inane, but if ghost written they would have done it better. David said this was one of the most authentic moments of politics.

How applicable to local politics?

Already happening with Meetup. Make this into a movement. Where the local organizer is helping on both the national and local levels. Could be difficult to execute, but if we don't do it, it may not be possible.

Ed: What happened after November?

It was hard to communicate to people that there was a holy shit moment. Internet supporters complacent. Went from people not going out to dinner to have money to donate to a perception of success that kept people from donating. Disconnect between the body politic of the Internet and what was happening after Gore's endorsement and how to communicate to them when things have changed. We had a hard time conveying that we were in trouble, because the press reads the blog too. Transparency problem. How to have honest (and private) communication with your support base. How do you maintain the openness and free spirit while doing this? Especially when people don't know the difference in real politics.

Glen Tenny: learned that all politics ain't local, its global. You used the national Internet to incite some local people. When can you have a constituency running a local campaign that isn't pushed down by the national?

Can't do it yet. Its still at the point where a national base where opinion leaders and financial backing drives it. Local contributors and volunteers alone will not win broadcast politics, which has to be addressed as well.

Ed Cone: Dick Rowe said that eventually you would be seen as the McCain of wireless.

Dan Gillmor: lets say the press screwed it for you. What will it take for people in this room to create a different kind of journalism and how long will it take?

Already happening with Trent Lott. Dean in the early days was hotter on the Internet and it took the media until June to figure it out. The only way the press wrote about the Internet campaign was the money. Its the money, stupid. It has to be how do you get 2-3M americans to give $100. Its the special interest money against us.

Some idiot plugging his documentary

Micha Sifry: Contrast with Perot who owned the list. Who owns the lists at Dean Campaign?

Honestly, I don't know. I'm not there. We tried opening up the list to local orgs, but it created a spam problem.

Joe is going to do something related to a movement. The organization has a chance to keep going. Apprehensive about giving to the party.

Change vs. the Status Quo is what got Dean to the lead, then it was voting for the Nominee, the moment of choice got moved up before there isn't a vote. Now with Kerry people are voting Virginia and Tennesse for leader. In Wisconson, the vote will be Kerry as the decision point and at every time in history voters say no, and move away from the front runner. There is a chance for the movement to build through Dean. If Kerry wins Wisconson, its over. Then does Kerry bring Dean closer?

O'Reilly Intro

Changing the world by spreading the knowledge of innovators. Digital Democracy is an emerging area of innovation. Wonderful moment to hear from the pioneers.

Joe is the Edison of the Movement (Brit Blaser), although we are not sure if he has found the right filament says Tim.

Open source, understood the power of community that can make a difference.

February 08, 2004

Conference Blogging

Blogged lots of conferences lately. Of course, part of it is my business. I have observed a couple of different modes of conference blogging:

  • Dedicated Transcription -- word for word. Usually conference bloggers will cede this mode by the second session to someone who does it really well, who then feels obligated to keep it up. Perhaps the most helpful f